I don’t understand a lot of things. I don’t understand why my neighbor is pursuing a career as a 1990’s electronic music artist. I don’t understand why the ice cream shop near my house considers two scoops of ice cream one scoop. And I don’t understand how women, educated journalists, can be so…
| Frederick Seidel: | It is possible to offend people still, and my poems not infrequently do. One way to do it is to write beautifully what people don’t want to hear. |
| Interviewer: | You think beauty enters into it? |
| Frederick Seidel: | Yes. The wrong thing to say, a harsh way to say it, but done beautifully, done perfectly. I like poems that are daggers that sing. |
—
Amy Poehler on American Apparel ads (via youngfolksociety)(via insta-grammar)(via bigundies)
always gonna reblog, because you wouldn’t believe the amount of casting notices asking for “really thin, anorexic-types” or the ever popular “heroin chic” - translation: weird, exhausted girls.
(Source: elisabethlovesthis, via discosherpa)
Cate Blanchett goes sans Photoshop for magazine cover
Intelligent Life — The Economist‘s lifestyle and culture magazine — went where few (but increasingly more!) publications have gone before: the unairbrushed cover.
Cate Blanchett fronts the latest issue of the bi-monthly, a cover choice explained by Intelligent Life editor Tim de Lisle on the magazine’s website:
When other magazines photograph actresses, they routinely end up running heavily Photoshopped images, with every last wrinkle expunged. Their skin is rendered so improbably smooth that, with the biggest stars, you wonder why the photographer didn’t just do a shoot with their waxwork.
Cate Blanchett, by contrast, appears on our cover in her working clothes, with the odd line on her face and faint bags under her eyes. She looks like what she is — a woman of 42, spending her days in an office, her evenings on stage and the rest of her time looking after three young children. We can’t be too self-righteous about it, because, like anyone else who puts her on a cover, we are benefiting from her beauty and distinction. But the shot is at least trying to reflect real life. It’s a curious sign of the times that this has become something to shout about.
But the cover doesn’t just make a statement about Photoshop, it also makes one about the sometimes dicey ethics of magazine photography. Tim de Lisle explained: “Publishers want a recognizable person on the cover, with a real career; but they also want an empty vessel — for clothes and jewelry and makeup, which often seem to be supplied by the advertisers with the most muscle.”
Erwin Blumenfeld Woman Behind Dotted Veil, Amsterdam 1932
“Beauty is not pretty.” Erwin Blumenfeld
(via songbirdstew)
This is my favorite picture of my absolute favorite actress…
I think I always disappoint people, because they always expect someone very pretty. Very done. There`s so much pressure to be thin, blonde and busty. I`m skinny, but even I couldn`t fit into some of the clothes there (in L.A.)!” In a funny kind of way, I think you create it yourself. I think it`s much better to go with the flow and embrace your body, whatever shape it is, and just be happy.
I take my hat off to actresses there, particularly the young ones, because the emphasis is on trying to find perfection. But I think it`s the imperfections in people that make them perfect. I don`t find perfect faces very interesting.
Featured / FEMALE / 16 TO 22 / 5’ 7” - 6’ 5”
‘High-fashion, “heroin chic.” Jutting bones, spine and ribs visible, gaunt face, almost emaciated. Beautiful…’
And variations on the same: ‘Ultra-thin, haunting, “heroin chic” look.’ ‘Must be super-thin, and morbidly beautiful.’
HEROIN CHIC, GUYS.
—
Naomi Wolf
The Beauty Myth (via subconciousevolution)
(Source: thestrals-, via discosherpa)
— Taylor Swift (via typicalovestory)












